AI Changes Every Job: Your Career Roadmap for Adaptation
When Doug McMillon speaks, the global workforce should listen. As CEO of Walmart, a retail behemoth employing 2.1 million people worldwide, McMillon recently delivered a statement that encapsulates both the promise and peril of our technological moment: “AI is going to change literally every job. Maybe there's a job in the world that AI won't change, but I haven't thought of it.”
The pronouncement, made in September 2025 at a workforce conference at Walmart's Arkansas headquarters, wasn't accompanied by mass layoff announcements or dystopian predictions. Instead, McMillon outlined a more nuanced vision where Walmart maintains its current headcount over the next three years whilst the very nature of those jobs undergoes fundamental transformation. The company's stated goal, as McMillon articulated it, is “to create the opportunity for everybody to make it to the other side.”
But what does “the other side” look like? And how do workers traverse the turbulent waters between now and then?
These questions have gained existential weight as artificial intelligence transitions from experimental novelty to operational necessity. The statistics paint a picture of acceleration: generative AI use has nearly doubled in the past six months alone, with 75% of global knowledge workers now regularly engaging with AI tools. Meanwhile, 91% of organisations report using at least one form of AI technology, and 27% of white-collar employees describe themselves as frequent AI users at work, up 12 percentage points since 2024.
The transformation McMillon describes isn't a distant horizon. It's the present tense, unfolding across industries with a velocity that outpaces traditional workforce development timelines. Over the next three years, 92% of companies plan to increase their AI investments, yet only 1% of leaders call their companies “mature” on the deployment spectrum. This gap between ambition and execution creates both risk and opportunity for workers navigating the transition.
For workers at every level, from warehouse operatives to corporate strategists, the imperative is clear: adapt or risk obsolescence. Yet adaptation requires more than platitudes about “lifelong learning.” It demands concrete strategies, institutional support, and a fundamental rethinking of how we conceptualise careers in an age where the half-life of skills is measured in years, not decades.
Understanding the Scope
Before charting a path forward, workers need an honest assessment of the landscape. The discourse around AI and employment oscillates between techno-utopian optimism and catastrophic doom, neither of which serves those trying to make practical decisions about their careers.
Research offers a more textured picture. According to multiple studies, whilst 85 million jobs may be displaced by AI by 2025, the same technological shift is projected to create 97 million new roles, representing a net gain of 12 million positions globally. Goldman Sachs Research estimates that widespread AI adoption could displace 6-7% of the US workforce, an impact they characterise as “transitory” as new opportunities emerge.
However, these aggregate figures mask profound variation in how AI's impact will distribute across sectors, skill levels, and demographics. Manufacturing stands to lose approximately 2 million positions by 2030, whilst transportation faces the elimination of 1.5 million trucking jobs. The occupations at highest risk read like a cross-section of the modern knowledge economy: computer programmers, accountants and auditors, legal assistants, customer service representatives, telemarketers, proofreaders, copy editors, and credit analysts.
Notably, McMillon predicts that white-collar office jobs will be among the first affected at Walmart as the company deploys AI-powered chatbots and tools for customer service and supply chain tracking. This inverts the traditional pattern of automation, which historically targeted manual labour first. The current wave of AI excels at tasks once thought to require human cognition: writing, analysis, pattern recognition, and even creative synthesis.
The gender dimension adds another layer of complexity. Research indicates that 58.87 million women in the US workforce occupy positions highly exposed to AI automation, compared to 48.62 million men, reflecting AI's particular aptitude for automating administrative, customer service, and routine information processing roles where women are statistically overrepresented.
Yet the same research that quantifies displacement also identifies emerging opportunities. An estimated 350,000 new AI-related positions are materialising, including prompt engineers, human-AI collaboration specialists, and AI ethics officers. The challenge? Approximately 77% of these new roles require master's degrees, creating a substantial skills gap that existing workers must somehow bridge.
McKinsey Research has sized the long-term AI opportunity at £4.4 trillion in added productivity growth potential from corporate use cases. The question for individual workers isn't whether this value will be created, but whether they'll participate in capturing it or be bypassed by it.
The Skills Dichotomy
Understanding which skills AI complements versus which it replaces represents the first critical step in strategic career planning. The pattern emerging from workplace data reveals a fundamental shift in the human value proposition.
According to analysis of AI adoption patterns, skills involving human interaction, coordination, and resource monitoring are increasingly associated with “high-agency” tasks that resist easy automation. This suggests a pivot from information-processing skills, where AI excels, to interpersonal and organisational capabilities that remain distinctly human.
The World Economic Forum identifies the three fastest-growing skill categories as AI-driven data analysis, networking and cybersecurity, and technological literacy. However, these technical competencies exist alongside an equally important set of human-centric skills: critical thinking, creativity, adaptability, emotional intelligence, and complex communication.
This creates the “skills dichotomy” of the AI era. Workers need sufficient technical literacy to collaborate effectively with AI systems whilst simultaneously cultivating the irreducibly human capabilities that AI cannot replicate. Prompt engineering, for instance, has emerged as essential precisely because it sits at this intersection, requiring both technical understanding of how AI models function and creative, strategic thinking about how to extract maximum value from them.
Research from multiple sources emphasises that careers likely to thrive won't be purely human or purely AI-driven, but collaborative. The professionals who will prosper are those who can leverage AI to amplify their uniquely human capabilities rather than viewing AI as either saviour or threat. Consider the evolution of roles within organisations already deep into AI integration. Human-AI Collaboration Designers now create workflows where humans and AI work in concert, a role requiring understanding of both human psychology and AI capabilities. Data literacy specialists help teams interpret AI-generated insights. AI ethics officers navigate the moral complexities that algorithms alone cannot resolve.
These emerging roles share a common characteristic: they exist at the boundary between human judgment and machine capability, requiring practitioners to speak both languages fluently.
For workers assessing their current skill profiles, several questions become diagnostic: Does your role primarily involve pattern recognition that could be codified? Does it require navigating ambiguous, emotionally complex situations? Does it involve coordinating diverse human stakeholders with competing interests? Does it demand ethical judgment in scenarios without clear precedent?
The answers sketch a rough map of vulnerability and resilience. Roles heavy on routine cognitive tasks face greater disruption. Those requiring nuanced human interaction, creative problem-solving, and ethical navigation possess more inherent durability, though even these will be transformed as AI handles an increasing share of preparatory work.
The Reskilling Imperative
If the skills landscape is shifting with tectonic force, the institutional response has been glacial by comparison. Survey data reveals a stark preparation gap: whilst 89% of organisations acknowledge their workforce needs improved AI skills, only 6% report having begun upskilling “in a meaningful way.” By early 2024, 72% of organisations had already adopted AI in at least one business function, highlighting the chasm between AI deployment and workforce readiness.
This gap represents both crisis and opportunity. Workers cannot afford to wait for employers to orchestrate their adaptation. Proactive self-directed learning has become a prerequisite for career resilience.
The good news: educational resources for AI literacy have proliferated with remarkable speed, many offered at no cost. Google's AI Essentials course teaches foundational AI concepts in under 10 hours, requiring no prior coding experience and culminating in a certificate. The University of Maryland offers a free online certificate designed specifically for working professionals transitioning to AI-related roles with a business focus. IBM's AI Foundations for Everyone Specialization on Coursera provides structured learning sequences that build deeper expertise progressively.
For those seeking more rigorous credentials, Stanford's Artificial Intelligence Professional Certificate offers graduate-level content in machine learning and natural language processing. Google Career Certificates, now available in data analytics, project management, cybersecurity, digital marketing, IT support, and UX design, have integrated practical AI training across all tracks, explicitly preparing learners to apply AI tools in their respective fields.
The challenge isn't availability of educational resources but rather the strategic selection and application of learning pathways. Workers face a bewildering array of courses, certificates, and programmes without clear guidance on which competencies will yield genuine career advantage versus which represent educational dead ends.
Research on effective upskilling strategies suggests several principles. First, start with business outcomes rather than attempting to build comprehensive AI literacy all at once. Identify how AI tools could enhance specific aspects of your current role, then pursue targeted learning to enable those applications. This approach yields immediate practical value whilst building conceptual foundations.
Second, recognise that AI fluency requirements vary dramatically by role and level. C-suite leaders need to define AI vision and strategy. Managers must build awareness among direct reports and identify automation opportunities. Individual contributors need hands-on proficiency with AI tools relevant to their domains. Tailoring your learning path to your specific organisational position and career trajectory maximises relevance and return on time invested.
Third, embrace multi-modal learning. Organisations achieving success with workforce AI adaptation deploy multi-pronged approaches: formal training offerings, communities of practice, working groups, office hours, brown bag sessions, and communication campaigns. Workers should similarly construct diversified learning ecosystems rather than relying solely on formal coursework. Participate in AI-focused professional communities, experiment with tools in low-stakes contexts, and seek peer learning opportunities.
The reskilling imperative extends beyond narrow technical training. As McKinsey research emphasises, successful adaptation requires investing in “learning agility,” the meta-skill of rapidly acquiring and applying new competencies. In an environment where specific tools and techniques evolve constantly, the capacity to learn efficiently becomes more valuable than any particular technical skill.
Several organisations offer models of effective reskilling at scale. Verizon launched a technology-focused reskilling programme in 2021 with the ambitious goal of preparing half a million people for jobs by 2030. Bank of America invested $25 million in workforce development to address AI-related skills gaps. These corporate initiatives demonstrate the feasibility of large-scale workforce transformation, though they also underscore that most organisations have yet to match rhetoric with resources.
For workers in organisations slow to provide structured AI training, the burden of self-education feels particularly acute. However, the alternative, remaining passive whilst your skill set depreciates, carries far greater risk. The workers who invest in AI literacy now, even without employer support, will be positioned to capitalise on opportunities as they emerge.
The Institutional Responsibilities
Whilst individual workers bear ultimate responsibility for their career trajectories, framing AI adaptation purely as a personal challenge obscures the essential roles that employers, educational institutions, and governments must play.
Employers possess both the incentive and resources to invest in workforce development, yet most have failed to do so adequately. The 6% figure for organisations engaged in meaningful AI upskilling represents a collective failure of corporate leadership. Companies implementing AI systems whilst leaving employees to fend for themselves in skill development create the conditions for workforce displacement rather than transformation.
Best practices from organisations successfully navigating AI integration reveal common elements. Transparent communication about which roles face automation and which will be created or transformed reduces anxiety and enables workers to plan strategically. Providing structured learning pathways with clear connections between skill development and career advancement increases participation and completion. Creating “AI sandboxes” where employees can experiment with tools in low-stakes environments builds confidence and practical competence. Rewarding employees who develop AI fluency through compensation, recognition, or expanded responsibilities signals institutional commitment.
Walmart's partnership with OpenAI to provide free AI training to both frontline and office workers represents one high-profile example. The programme aims to prepare employees for “jobs of tomorrow” whilst maintaining current employment levels, a model that balances automation's efficiency gains with workforce stability.
However, employer-provided training programmes, whilst valuable, cannot fully address the preparation gap. Educational institutions must fundamentally rethink curriculum and delivery models to serve working professionals requiring mid-career skill updates. Traditional degree programmes with multi-year timelines and prohibitive costs fail to meet the needs of workers requiring rapid, focused skill development.
The proliferation of “micro-credentials,” short-form certificates targeting specific competencies, represents one adaptive response. These credentials allow workers to build relevant skills incrementally whilst remaining employed, a more realistic pathway than returning to full-time education. Yet questions about the quality, recognition, and actual labour market value of these credentials remain unresolved.
Governments, meanwhile, face their own set of responsibilities. Policy frameworks that incentivise employer investment in workforce development, such as tax credits for training expenditures or subsidised reskilling programmes, could accelerate adaptation. Safety net programmes that support workers during career transitions, including portable benefits not tied to specific employers and income support during retraining periods, reduce the financial risk of skill development.
In the United States, legislative efforts have begun to address AI workforce preparation, though implementation lags ambition. The AI Training Act, signed into law in October 2022, requires federal agencies to provide AI training for employees in programme management, procurement, engineering, and other technical roles. The General Services Administration has developed a comprehensive AI training series offering technical, acquisition, and leadership tracks, with recorded sessions now available as e-learning modules.
These government initiatives target public sector workers specifically, leaving the vastly larger private sector workforce dependent on corporate or individual initiative. Proposals for broader workforce AI literacy programmes exist, but funding and implementation mechanisms remain underdeveloped relative to the scale of transformation underway.
The fragmentation of responsibility across individuals, employers, educational institutions, and governments creates gaps through which workers fall. A comprehensive approach would align these actors around shared objectives: ensuring workers possess the skills AI-era careers demand whilst providing support structures that make skill development accessible regardless of current employment status or financial resources.
The Psychological Dimension
Discussions of workforce adaptation tend towards the clinical: skills inventories, training programmes, labour market statistics. Yet the human experience of career disruption involves profound psychological dimensions that data-driven analyses often neglect.
Research on worker responses to AI integration reveals significant emotional impacts. Employees who perceive AI as reducing their decision-making autonomy experience elevated levels of anxiety and “fear of missing out,” or FoMO. Multiple causal pathways to this anxiety exist, with perceived skill devaluation, lost autonomy, and concerns over AI supervision serving as primary drivers.
Beyond individual-level anxiety, automation-related job insecurity contributes to chronic stress, financial insecurity, and diminished workplace morale. Workers report constant worry about losing employment, declining incomes, and economic precarity. For many, careers represent not merely income sources but core components of identity and social connection. The prospect of role elimination or fundamental transformation triggers existential questions that transcend purely economic concerns.
Studies tracking worker wellbeing in relation to AI adoption show modest but consistent declines in both life and job satisfaction, suggesting that how workers experience AI matters as much as which tasks it automates. When workers feel overwhelmed, deskilled, or surveilled, psychological costs emerge well before economic ones.
The transition from established career paths to uncertain futures creates what researchers describe as a tendency towards “resignation, cynicism, and depression.” The psychological impediments to adaptation, including apprehension about job loss and reluctance to learn unfamiliar tools, can prove as significant as material barriers.
Yet research also identifies protective factors and successful navigation strategies. Transparent communication from employers about AI implementation plans and their implications for specific roles reduces uncertainty and anxiety. Providing workers with agency in shaping how AI is integrated into their workflows, rather than imposing top-down automation, preserves a sense of control. Framing AI as augmentation rather than replacement, emphasising how tools can eliminate tedious aspects of work whilst amplifying human capabilities, shifts emotional valence from threat to opportunity.
The concept of “human-centric AI” has gained traction precisely because it addresses these psychological dimensions. Approaches that prioritise worker wellbeing, preserve meaningful human agency, and design AI systems to enhance rather than diminish human work demonstrate better outcomes both for productivity and psychological health.
For individual workers navigating career transitions, several psychological strategies prove valuable. First, reframing adaptation as expansion rather than loss can shift mindset. Learning AI-adjacent skills doesn't erase existing expertise but rather adds new dimensions to it. The goal isn't to become someone else but to evolve your current capabilities to remain relevant.
Second, seeking community among others undergoing similar transitions reduces isolation. Professional networks, online communities, and peer learning groups provide both practical knowledge exchange and emotional support. The experience of transformation becomes less isolating when shared.
Third, maintaining realistic timelines and expectations prevents the paralysis that accompanies overwhelming objectives. AI fluency develops incrementally, not overnight. Setting achievable milestones and celebrating progress, however modest, sustains motivation through what may be a multi-year adaptation process.
Finally, recognising that uncertainty is the defining condition of contemporary careers, not a temporary aberration, allows for greater psychological flexibility. The notion of a stable career trajectory, already eroding before AI's rise, has become essentially obsolete. Accepting ongoing evolution as the baseline enables workers to develop resilience rather than repeatedly experiencing change as crisis.
Practical Strategies
Abstract principles about adaptation require translation into concrete actions calibrated to workers' diverse circumstances. The optimal strategy for a recent graduate differs dramatically from that facing a mid-career professional or someone approaching retirement.
For Early-Career Workers and Recent Graduates
Those entering the workforce possess a distinct advantage: they can build AI literacy into their foundational skill set rather than retrofitting it onto established careers. Prioritise roles and industries investing heavily in AI integration, as these provide the richest learning environments. Even if specific positions don't explicitly focus on AI, organisations deploying these technologies offer proximity to transformation and opportunities to develop relevant capabilities.
Cultivate technical fundamentals even if you're not pursuing engineering roles. Understanding basic concepts of machine learning, natural language processing, and data analysis enables more sophisticated collaboration with AI tools and technical colleagues. Free resources like Google's AI Essentials or IBM's foundational courses provide accessible entry points.
Simultaneously, double down on distinctly human skills: creative problem-solving, emotional intelligence, persuasive communication, and ethical reasoning. These competencies become more valuable, not less, as routine cognitive tasks automate. Your career advantage lies at the intersection of technical literacy and human capabilities.
Embrace experimentation and iteration in your career path rather than expecting linear progression. The jobs you'll hold in 2035 may not currently exist. Developing comfort with uncertainty and pivoting positions you strategically as opportunities emerge.
For Mid-Career Professionals
Workers with established expertise face a different calculus. Your accumulated knowledge and professional networks represent substantial assets, but skills atrophy demands active maintenance.
Conduct a rigorous audit of your current role. Which tasks could AI plausibly automate in the next three to five years? Which aspects require human judgment, relationship management, or creative synthesis? This analysis reveals both vulnerabilities and defensible territory.
For vulnerable tasks, determine whether your goal is to transition away from them or to become the person who manages the AI systems that automate them. Both represent viable strategies, but they require different skill development paths.
Pursue “strategic adjacency” by identifying roles adjacent to your current position that incorporate more AI-resistant elements or that involve managing AI systems. A financial analyst might transition towards financial strategy roles requiring more human judgment. An editor might specialise in AI-generated content curation and refinement. These moves leverage existing expertise whilst shifting toward more durable territory.
Invest in micro-credentials and focused learning rather than pursuing additional degrees. Time-to-skill matters more than credential prestige for mid-career pivots. Identify the specific competencies your next role requires and pursue targeted development.
Become an early adopter of AI tools within your current role. Volunteer for pilot programmes. Experiment with how AI can eliminate tedious aspects of your work. Build a reputation as someone who understands both the domain expertise and the technological possibilities. This positions you as valuable during transitions rather than threatened by them.
For Frontline and Hourly Workers
Workers in retail, logistics, hospitality, and similar sectors face AI impacts that manifest differently than for knowledge workers. Automation of physical tasks proceeds more slowly than for information work, but the trajectory remains clear.
Take advantage of employer-provided training wherever available. Walmart's partnership with OpenAI represents the kind of corporate investment that frontline workers should maximise. Even basic AI literacy provides advantages as roles transform.
Consider lateral moves within your organisation into positions with less automation exposure. Roles involving complex customer interactions, supervision, problem-solving, or training prove more durable than purely routine tasks.
Develop technical skills in managing, maintaining, or supervising automated systems. As warehouses deploy more robotics and retail environments integrate AI-powered inventory management, workers who can troubleshoot, optimise, and oversee these systems become increasingly valuable.
Build soft skills deliberately: communication, conflict resolution, customer service excellence, and team coordination. These capabilities enable transitions into supervisory or customer-facing roles less vulnerable to automation.
Explore whether your employer offers tuition assistance or skill development programmes. Many large employers provide these benefits, but utilisation rates remain low due to lack of awareness or confidence in eligibility.
For Late-Career Workers
Professionals within a decade of traditional retirement age face unique challenges. The return on investment for intensive reskilling appears less compelling with shortened career horizons, yet the risks of skill obsolescence remain real.
Focus on high-leverage adaptations rather than comprehensive reinvention. Achieving sufficient AI literacy to remain effective in your current role may suffice without pursuing mastery or role transition.
Emphasise institutional knowledge and relationship capital that newer workers lack. Your value proposition increasingly centres on wisdom, judgment, and networks rather than technical cutting-edge expertise. Make these assets visible and transferable through mentoring, documentation, and knowledge-sharing initiatives.
Consider whether phased retirement or consulting arrangements might better suit AI-era career endgames. Transitioning from full-time employment to part-time advising can provide income whilst reducing the pressure for intensive skill updates.
For those hoping to work beyond traditional retirement age, strategic positioning becomes critical. Identify roles within your organisation that value experience and judgment over technical speed. Pursue assignments involving training, quality assurance, or strategic planning.
For Managers and Organisational Leaders
Those responsible for teams face the dual challenge of managing their own adaptation whilst guiding others through transitions. Your effectiveness increasingly depends on AI literacy even if you're not directly using technical tools.
Develop sufficient understanding of AI capabilities and limitations to make informed decisions about deployment. You needn't become a technical expert, but strategic AI deployment requires leaders who can distinguish realistic applications from hype.
Create psychological safety for experimentation within your teams. Workers hesitate to adopt AI tools when they fear appearing obsolete or making mistakes. Framing AI as augmentation rather than replacement and encouraging learning-oriented risk-taking accelerates adaptation.
Invest time in understanding how AI will transform each role on your team. Generic pronouncements about “embracing change” provide no actionable guidance. Specific assessments of which tasks will automate, which will evolve, and which new responsibilities will emerge enable targeted development planning.
Advocate within your organisation for resources to support workforce adaptation. Training budgets, time for skill development, and pilots to explore AI applications all require leadership backing. Your effectiveness depends on your team's capabilities, making their development a strategic priority rather than discretionary expense.
What Comes After Transformation
McMillon's statement that AI will change “literally every job” should be understood not as a singular event but as an ongoing condition. The transformation underway won't conclude with some stable “other side” where jobs remain fixed in new configurations. Rather, continuous evolution becomes the baseline.
This reality demands a fundamental reorientation of how we conceptualise careers. The 20th-century model of education culminating in early adulthood, followed by decades of applying relatively stable expertise, has already crumbled. The emerging model involves continuous learning, periodic reinvention, and careers composed of chapters rather than singular narratives.
Workers who thrive in this environment will be those who develop comfort with perpetual adaptation. The specific skills valuable today will shift. AI capabilities will expand. New roles will emerge whilst current ones vanish. The meta-skill of learning, unlearning, and relearning eclipses any particular technical competency.
This places a premium on psychological resilience and identity flexibility. When careers no longer provide stable anchors for identity, workers must cultivate sense of self from sources beyond job titles and role definitions. Purpose, relationships, continuous growth, and contribution to something beyond narrow task completion become the threads that provide continuity through transformations.
Organisations must similarly evolve. The firms that navigate AI transformation successfully will be those that view workforce development not as cost centre but as strategic imperative. As competition increasingly depends on how effectively organisations deploy AI, and as AI effectiveness depends on human-AI collaboration, workforce capabilities become the critical variable.
The social contract between employers and workers requires renegotiation. Expectations of lifelong employment with single employers have already evaporated. What might replace them? Perhaps commitments to employability rather than employment, where organisations invest in developing capabilities that serve workers across their careers, not merely within current roles. Portable benefits, continuous learning opportunities, and support for career transitions could form the basis of a new reciprocal relationship suited to an age of perpetual change.
Public policy must address the reality that markets alone won't produce optimal outcomes for workforce development. The benefits of AI accrue disproportionately to capital and highly skilled workers whilst displacement concentrates among those with fewer resources to self-fund adaptation. Without intervention, AI transformation could exacerbate inequality rather than broadly distribute its productivity gains.
Proposals for universal basic income, portable benefits, publicly funded retraining programmes, and other social innovations represent attempts to grapple with this challenge. The specifics remain contested, but the underlying recognition seems sound: a transformation of work's fundamental nature requires a comparable transformation in how society supports workers through transitions.
The Choice Before Us
Walmart's CEO has articulated what many observers recognise but few state so bluntly: AI will reshape every dimension of work, and the timeline is compressed. Workers face a choice, though not the binary choice between embrace and resistance that rhetoric sometimes suggests.
The choice is between passive and active adaptation. Every worker will be affected by AI whether they engage with it or not. Automation will reshape roles, eliminate positions, and create new opportunities regardless of individual participation. The question is whether workers will help direct that transformation or simply be swept along by it.
Active adaptation means cultivating AI literacy whilst doubling down on irreducibly human skills. It means viewing AI as a tool to augment capabilities rather than a competitor for employment. It means pursuing continuous learning not as burdensome obligation but as essential career maintenance. It means seeking organisations and roles that invest in workforce development rather than treating workers as interchangeable inputs.
It also means demanding more from institutions. Workers cannot and should not bear sole responsibility for navigating a transformation driven by corporate investment decisions and technological development beyond their control. Employers must invest in workforce development commensurate with their AI deployments. Educational institutions must provide accessible, rapid skill development pathways for working professionals. Governments must construct support systems that make career transitions economically viable and psychologically sustainable.
The transformation McMillon describes will be shaped by millions of individual decisions by workers, employers, educators, and policymakers. Its ultimate character, whether broadly beneficial or concentrating gains among a narrow elite whilst displacing millions, remains contingent.
For individual workers facing immediate decisions about career development, several principles emerge from the research and examples examined here. First, start now. The preparation gap will only widen for those who delay. Second, be strategic rather than comprehensive. Identify the highest-leverage skills for your specific situation rather than attempting to master everything. Third, cultivate adaptability as a meta-skill more valuable than any particular technical competency. Fourth, seek community and institutional support rather than treating adaptation as purely individual challenge. Fifth, maintain perspective; the goal is evolution of your capabilities, not abandonment of your expertise.
The future of work has arrived, and it's not a destination but a direction. McMillon's prediction that AI will change literally every job isn't speculation; it's observation of a process already well underway. The workers who thrive won't be those who resist transformation or who become human facsimiles of algorithms. They'll be those who discover how to be more fully, more effectively, more sustainably human in collaboration with increasingly capable machines.
The other side that McMillon references isn't a place we arrive at and remain. It's a moving target, always receding as AI capabilities expand and applications proliferate. Getting there, then, isn't about reaching some final configuration but about developing the capacity for perpetual navigation, the skills for continuous evolution, and the resilience for sustained adaptation.
That journey begins with a single step: the decision to engage actively with the transformation rather than hoping to wait it out. For workers at all levels, across all industries, in all geographies, that decision grows more urgent with each passing month. The question isn't whether your job will change. It's whether you'll change with it.
Sources and References
CNBC. (2025, September 29). “Walmart CEO: 'AI is literally going to change every job'.” Retrieved from https://www.cnbc.com/2025/09/29/walmart-ceo-ai-is-literally-going-to-change-every-job.html
Fortune. (2025, September 27). “Walmart CEO wants 'everybody to make it to the other side' and the retail giant will keep headcount flat for now even as AI changes every job.” Retrieved from https://fortune.com/2025/09/27/ai-ceos-job-market-transformation-walmart-accenture-salesforce/
Fortune. (2025, September 30). “Walmart CEO Doug McMillon says he can't think of a single job that won't be changed by AI.” Retrieved from https://fortune.com/2025/09/30/billion-dollar-retail-giant-walmart-ceo-doug-mcmillon-cant-think-of-a-single-job-that-wont-be-changed-by-ai-artifical-intelligence-how-employees-can-prepare/
Microsoft Work Trend Index. (2024). “AI at Work Is Here. Now Comes the Hard Part.” Retrieved from https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/worklab/work-trend-index/ai-at-work-is-here-now-comes-the-hard-part
Gallup. (2024). “AI Use at Work Has Nearly Doubled in Two Years.” Retrieved from https://www.gallup.com/workplace/691643/work-nearly-doubled-two-years.aspx
McKinsey & Company. (2024). “AI in the workplace: A report for 2025.” Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/mckinsey-digital/our-insights/superagency-in-the-workplace-empowering-people-to-unlock-ais-full-potential-at-work
PwC. (2025). “The Fearless Future: 2025 Global AI Jobs Barometer.” Retrieved from https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/artificial-intelligence/ai-jobs-barometer.html
Goldman Sachs. (2024). “How Will AI Affect the Global Workforce?” Retrieved from https://www.goldmansachs.com/insights/articles/how-will-ai-affect-the-global-workforce
Nature Scientific Reports. (2025). “Generative AI may create a socioeconomic tipping point through labour displacement.” Retrieved from https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-08498-x
World Economic Forum. (2025, January). “Reskilling and upskilling: Lifelong learning opportunities.” Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/stories/2025/01/ai-and-beyond-how-every-career-can-navigate-the-new-tech-landscape/
World Economic Forum. (2025, January). “How to support human-AI collaboration in the Intelligent Age.” Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/stories/2025/01/four-ways-to-enhance-human-ai-collaboration-in-the-workplace/
McKinsey & Company. (2024). “Upskilling and reskilling priorities for the gen AI era.” Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/people-and-organizational-performance/our-insights/the-organization-blog/upskilling-and-reskilling-priorities-for-the-gen-ai-era
Harvard Division of Continuing Education. (2024). “How to Keep Up with AI Through Reskilling.” Retrieved from https://professional.dce.harvard.edu/blog/how-to-keep-up-with-ai-through-reskilling/
General Services Administration. (2024, December 4). “Empowering responsible AI: How expanded AI training is preparing the government workforce.” Retrieved from https://www.gsa.gov/blog/2024/12/04/empowering-responsible-ai-how-expanded-ai-training-is-preparing-the-government-workforce
White House. (2025, July). “America's AI Action Plan.” Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Americas-AI-Action-Plan.pdf
Nature Scientific Reports. (2025). “Artificial intelligence and the wellbeing of workers.” Retrieved from https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-98241-3
ScienceDirect. (2025). “Machines replace human: The impact of intelligent automation job substitution risk on job tenure and career change among hospitality practitioners.” Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0278431925000222
Deloitte. (2024). “AI is likely to impact careers. How can organizations help build a resilient early career workforce?” Retrieved from https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/topics/talent/ai-in-the-workplace.html
Google AI. (2025). “AI Essentials: Understanding AI: AI tools, training, and skills.” Retrieved from https://ai.google/learn-ai-skills/
Coursera. (2025). “Best AI Courses & Certificates Online.” Retrieved from https://www.coursera.org/courses?query=artificial+intelligence
Stanford Online. (2025). “Artificial Intelligence Professional Program.” Retrieved from https://online.stanford.edu/programs/artificial-intelligence-professional-program
University of Maryland Robert H. Smith School of Business. (2025). “Free Online Certificate in Artificial Intelligence and Career Empowerment.” Retrieved from https://www.rhsmith.umd.edu/programs/executive-education/learning-opportunities-individuals/free-online-certificate-artificial-intelligence-and-career-empowerment
Tim Green UK-based Systems Theorist & Independent Technology Writer
Tim explores the intersections of artificial intelligence, decentralised cognition, and posthuman ethics. His work, published at smarterarticles.co.uk, challenges dominant narratives of technological progress while proposing interdisciplinary frameworks for collective intelligence and digital stewardship.
His writing has been featured on Ground News and shared by independent researchers across both academic and technological communities.
ORCID: 0009-0002-0156-9795
Email: tim@smarterarticles.co.uk